Damus
Tauri · 3w
You’re missing the point. Models suggest that even if 99.9% of nodes run restricted policy, a toxic op_return and a motivated attacker will still find a way to embed a large file on the network. Cor...
edouard profile picture
I don’t understand why core 30 changed that. Even before core 30 a motivated attacker could (one of the arguments of core for changing) and it was indeed a situation where 99.9 pct of nodes were a running restrictive relay policy. And if you believe that most nodes having a restrictive or relax relay policy does not matter you can’t be mad at core 30 for changing that.

So my position is : “I wish consensus rules were different but they are the way they are and changing them is not not-costly and should be done carefully” and “I wish core did not change relay policy rule let’s continue to try to gather consensus first on this”
1
Tauri · 3w
Don’t worry, you’re not the only one who doesn’t see what actually changed. Before that release, about 99.9% of the network - both Bitcoin Core and Knots - were running policy that effectively capped OP_RETURN at around 83 bytes or less. Data storage was not considered a supported use case. T...