I'm going to turn a lot of new friends into enemies with this post, but here goes...
I was for #BIP110, and I still think it would've been best for Bitcoin. But it didn't get the hashrate it needed, ...
Right there with you and I like this node implementation MonetaryNode. I even viewed the softfork as aggressive, but necessary. If this node implementation does and succeeds without disruption to the network I'm more for this route. I get what I want locally, people can store junk if they want, node runners old and new have impactful choice between dev teams, and we can all be in consensus. Elegant. Glad to find more rational and strategic Type 1s in Bitcoin.
🧡1