@nprofile1q...
But that letter is meant to be PR, persuasive, not solid reporting of what happened.
I see accounts like this, though:
"The spending estimates for the Department of National Defence include funding for Operation Unifier, an armed forces training mission for Ukrainian soldiers. The Conservatives voted against approving that estimate." [1]
Voting against etimates that included spending for the program may not have been the vote against the program that is being portrayed. I was looking for more solid evidence of that.
[1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/late-night-house-of-commons-carbon-tax-1.7052741
But that letter is meant to be PR, persuasive, not solid reporting of what happened.
I see accounts like this, though:
"The spending estimates for the Department of National Defence include funding for Operation Unifier, an armed forces training mission for Ukrainian soldiers. The Conservatives voted against approving that estimate." [1]
Voting against etimates that included spending for the program may not have been the vote against the program that is being portrayed. I was looking for more solid evidence of that.
[1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/late-night-house-of-commons-carbon-tax-1.7052741