While it’s true that Bitcoin isn’t a chemical element in the traditional, scientific sense, the term “digital element” can still be meaningful—especially when viewed through a broader lens o...
It seems we’re aligned: classifying Bitcoin as “element zero” on the periodic table (implying atomic number 0 = zero mass) is conceptually flawed, as it is not a chemical element. That said, the notion of a “Digital Element Zero” remains philosophically intriguing. I also concur that Bitcoin exhibits properties comparable to SI base units such as the meter, second, or kilogram.