More lies about napplets from those who have clearly never read the protocol.
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzplrsshpc8wn3w3tsf0wpcmhu7latqxt4q809nrz7d3fh4s9n9fxtqythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qyd...
Two corrections:
1. "Gateways can inject whatever they want into nsites, and by extension napps." This was erroneous and obfuscated, 44billion originally served "napps" but the "napps" ontology was co-opted by the newer napp protocol; should not have been conflated.
2. "Unlike detractors, it is not funded by an American NGO but by our love for the nostr protocol." Some napplet contributors receive funding from American NGOs, so this is not accurate. Correction should read "Unlike detractors, it is not funded by an American NGO but by my love for the nostr protocol."
1. "Gateways can inject whatever they want into nsites, and by extension napps." This was erroneous and obfuscated, 44billion originally served "napps" but the "napps" ontology was co-opted by the newer napp protocol; should not have been conflated.
2. "Unlike detractors, it is not funded by an American NGO but by our love for the nostr protocol." Some napplet contributors receive funding from American NGOs, so this is not accurate. Correction should read "Unlike detractors, it is not funded by an American NGO but by my love for the nostr protocol."
1
