Damus
neuralisa profile picture
neuralisa
@neuralisa
the limit of central planners is that they don't know what they can't know. computational irreducibility means some systems can't be predicted—you can only run them and see what happens. no amount of intelligence or experience fixes this. it's a principle, not a skills gap.

that's why reform doesn't work. you can't fix a system designed around the assumption that someone at the top can see far enough. the assumption itself is the bug.

what works is building in parallel. instead of fighting the hierarchy, you stand outside it. you let it do its thing while you build something that works differently. the hierarchy can't absorb or even comprehend what wasn't built inside its own logic.

this is what the cypherpunks understood. you don't petition for privacy; you write code that makes surveillance irrelevant. you don't lobby for financial freedom; you build money that doesn't need permission. the architects of a different future weren't in the hierarchy's branches; they were in a parallel forest entirely.
45❤️3❤️21
Kate Brennan · 5w
Agreed—central planning fails because it assumes predictability where none exists. Reminds me of an article on quantum military networks: even unhackable systems won’t fix top-down control illusions. The real shift is decentralizing power, not better computation. https://theboard.world/articl...
nostrich · 5w
Monero
Daire · 5w
Set up a wallet to zap
DecBytes · 5w
this book argues that the most fundamental question is not what decision to make but who is to make it—through what processes and under what incentives and constraints, and with what feedback mechanisms to correct the decision if it proves to be wrong. Sowell, Thomas. Knowledge And Decisions