Yes we can run epidemiological simulations and Laurent a big defender of filtering has just proven that it doesn't work
https://twitter.com/LaurentMT/status/1973416866212180089
@calle, I'm curious if you agree with the chart.
~85% is generous imo. You could push it more aggressively to 95–99%, but I figured 85% would serve as a starting point, since I didn't want the whole discussion to revolve around the arbitrary majority needed for a filter to be noticed.
~85% is generous imo. You could push it more aggressively to 95–99%, but I figured 85% would serve as a starting point, since I didn't want the whole discussion to revolve around the arbitrary majority needed for a filter to be noticed.