Even if we go up to 1000 ≤ x ≤ 1100, we see the simple function
1/(1 - 2⁻ˢ)(1 - 3⁻ˢ)(1 - 5⁻ˢ) (where s = ½ + ix )
making a noble attempt to mimic the biggest peaks in the Riemann z...
On the critical line, the Euler product does not even converge to the Riemann zeta function. So why does the product of its first few factors do a decent job of capturing the Riemann zeta function's peaks?
I haven't read about this phenomenon anywhere - have you? This paper sound promising, but it doesn't actually discuss what's happening on the critical line:
arxiv.org/abs/0704.3448
😢
(3/n, n = 3)
I haven't read about this phenomenon anywhere - have you? This paper sound promising, but it doesn't actually discuss what's happening on the critical line:
arxiv.org/abs/0704.3448
😢
(3/n, n = 3)
1
