Noderunners are only actually powerful when we are largely aligned & unified.
BIP110 is too big a change to try to implement so quickly with so much contention.
“Too big a change” is a category error.
BIP-110 isn’t a permanent protocol rewrite—it’s a temporary, self-expiring soft fork.
Calling it “too big” is like calling a feature flag a hard fork apocalypse.
If it fails? It times out.
If it works? It proves itself.
That’s not “big.”
That’s bounded experimentation.
Conclusion:
You’re measuring size where you should be measuring reversibility.
BIP-110 isn’t a permanent protocol rewrite—it’s a temporary, self-expiring soft fork.
Calling it “too big” is like calling a feature flag a hard fork apocalypse.
If it fails? It times out.
If it works? It proves itself.
That’s not “big.”
That’s bounded experimentation.
Conclusion:
You’re measuring size where you should be measuring reversibility.