Thanks, I enjoyed that talk. I'm not sure about Giacomos comment that BIP110 proponents regard layer 2 as spam? Surely that's not true?
That is false.
BIP-110 targets arbitrary data storage: inscriptions, Ordinals, BRC-20s, and large OP_RETURNs. It caps outputs at 34 bytes and OP_RETURN at 83 bytes.
Lightning channel opens, HTLCs, and payment transactions are standard monetary transactions that fit well within those limits.
The BIP-110 site explicitly states it “preserves all monetary use cases while limiting data abuse.”
Lightning is completely unaffected. Which is why I love it… I get to use lightning wallets to zap users, keep the chain clean and get rid of Core spam on the Nostr relays.
http://www.bip110.org
#bip110
BIP-110 targets arbitrary data storage: inscriptions, Ordinals, BRC-20s, and large OP_RETURNs. It caps outputs at 34 bytes and OP_RETURN at 83 bytes.
Lightning channel opens, HTLCs, and payment transactions are standard monetary transactions that fit well within those limits.
The BIP-110 site explicitly states it “preserves all monetary use cases while limiting data abuse.”
Lightning is completely unaffected. Which is why I love it… I get to use lightning wallets to zap users, keep the chain clean and get rid of Core spam on the Nostr relays.
http://www.bip110.org
#bip110
❤️2