Agreed. “To be fair” is good advice, it seems easy to read into this tweet different things than he actually wrote. That is a bit of injustice, no?

If Saylor or any company or any person can introduce counter party risk into the bitcoin “protocol”, just by buying bitcoin, then would that not render bitcoin by definition futile?

(He did not suggest buy MSTR; he did not suggest “buy bitcoin and custody it the way MSTR does if you think the world order is breaking down”, and he did not affirm, at least here, that he himself believes the world order is breaking down. I have no idea if he really thinks it is outside of this.)