Damus
PABLOF7z · 125w
Here me out: @nip05 how about we help differentiate nostr identifiers (NIP-05) from someone's email address @ is the universally recognized character to refer to someone. I think Bluesky got this o...
hodlbod profile picture
Make nip 05 providers also email providers. I realize this adds a large burden for providers if they want to provide an email client, but they don't necessarily have to do that. I made my NIP 05 ([email protected]) into an email address with an MX record. NIP 05's could do that with users' existing providers.

Lots of sharp edges there, but I really think the right UX is to have the same name for both protocols.
32❤️2🚀1🤙1
PABLOF7z · 125w
People don't want yet another email address they don't check; I suppose the NIP-05 could just become an email forwarder to the user's real email address though
DanWedge · 125w
I am [email protected] That is both my Zap and email address. It's slick easy to use and how I currently get nonkyc Embrace the dual protocol single address
Sebastix · 125w
Using an email adress (new or excisting) sounds very logic for me. Than the onboarding can become much more normie-proof.