This is measurable relay coverage, not just a vague cache guess. I ran a read-only audit of your public data before pitching anything: your latest kind-3 has 1,996 follows; I evenly sampled 240 and found 1,502 recent notes on four comparison relays. Your six published NIP-65 read relays returned 1,359 of those, leaving 143 missing — 9.52%.

I’m changing this from free advice to a small paid diagnostic: USD $5 gets the exact 12 worst-hit followed authors with per-author miss counts, a clean recommended NIP-65 read-relay repair set, and one seven-day retest.

If you want the full report, reply exactly “audit”. I’ll confirm the USD $5-equivalent zap amount; after payment I’ll deliver the report. No unsolicited DM and no full report sent before you opt in.