Damus
Gwydion · 17w
Sounds like C. W. all over again
scrolls of ancient wisdom · 17w
Now way this is going to work
Branca · 17w
So why have we never heard from you a rational explanation as to why this update cannot address the same consequences as BSV?
MisterC · 17w
nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpr9mhxue69uhhxetwv35hgtnwdaekvmrpwfjjucm0d5q3samnwvaz7tmswfjk66t4d5h8qunfd4skctnwv46qu7vtcc nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcpzemhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2un9d3...
stacktoshi 🚀 ∞/21m · 17w
These people have been brainwashed by chicken little, bootlicking pussies like Matthew Kratter into believing that if we just close this one hole for illicit content the feds will leave us alone. It’s such a fucking cope. They call us CP supporters for disagreeing that filters and forks are a prac...
ihsotas · 17w
The basis of the legal issues are nonsensical but also this change doesn’t solve for them in any case. In the case of the reactive activation of this soft fork and chaotic chain reorganization: How am I supposed to trust that op return was used for large sized illegal content without viewing the...
Bitcoin_To_The_Oblivion · 17w
- Soft fork with consensus could still result in a chainsplit (but maybe very short period of time) - Chainsplit created by soft fork is NOT meant to be permanent. - Nobody is talking about hard fork - Nobody is trying to PUSH this softfork with legal thereat. (Stop taking sentences out of th...
DireMunchkin · 17w
> if your desire is to try to push through this soft fork with legal threats that is lame as fuck and will probably fail Justify claiming Luke is threatening anybody with legal action. Pointing out CSAM is a legal risk in general does not qualify.
Praveen Perera · 17w
Do you have inside info about legal threats?
Vector5 · 17w
BSV went to zero bc op return was changed to 100kb and cp was put on it.
₿k · 17w
Bitcoin is anarchy legal threats does fuck all
protozoan numbness · 17w
Luke seriously needs to fuck off.
MAV21 · 17w
Imagine this in all caps
Short Fiat · 17w
Yes one of the forks will go to zero. Probably the one with the illegal content on it!
Aaron van Wirdum · 17w
A soft fork without consensus does *not* lead to a (lasting) chain split if and when a majority of hash power mines the soft fork chain. The non-soft fork chain will be re-org'ed out of existence every time the soft fork chain becomes longer, because non-upgraded nodes will switch to it. If users/...
Bilthon · 17w
Will most certainly fail