Video: https://rumble.com/v75mcsy-jnnek-a-robotok-mi-lesz-a-munknkkal.html
🧠 Change is never born from “good ideas.”
Change always comes from problems and necessity. And this time will be no different: AI and robotics are not hobby projects — they are a response to the fact that running the world has become too expensive, too slow, and too complex.
⚙️ If we understand this, the real question is not whether robotics is coming. The real question is what we do with it — as individuals and as a society. Many of you immediately asked in the comments: what happens to those whose jobs are replaced by robots? A fair question.
📜 This has happened many times in history.
Hunter-gatherer societies gave way to agriculture — and suddenly most people no longer had to spend their entire day searching for food.
During the Industrial Revolution, machines triggered riots and factory burnings — yet in the end, society gained more than it lost.
The Roman aqueducts are another example: when water was no longer carried by people but moved by gravity “working” for us, it became cheaper, more accessible, and human energy was freed up for other purposes.
📊 I ran some numbers on what this could mean locally.
In Hungary, about 4.6 million people are employed, and roughly 900,000 jobs could potentially be automated (not all — closer to about a quarter). In certain types of tasks, one robot can replace the work of 4–5 people.
This is an enormous leap in efficiency — but it can also create serious tension if handled poorly.
🏛️ Here comes the sensitive part: I don’t believe the answer is simply “distributing money” to everyone.
If the solution is handing out free money, inflation is often the result — and over time the system can destabilize because it becomes unclear where and how labor was actually replaced. This won’t look like 10 robots arriving tomorrow and 40 people being fired. It will be a slow, gradual transition.
💡 A more realistic approach might be to use part of the productivity gains generated by robots to reduce taxes.
If one robot replaces the work of 4–5 people, the solution should not be to increase the burden on workers — but the opposite. The additional output generated by automation could help reduce taxes on human labor. In a simple model, I calculated that the tax burden could potentially be reduced by 7–8 percentage points — if implemented wisely and proportionally.
🏥 And there is another side: robotics doesn’t only replace — it also fills shortages.
Doctor shortages, surgeon shortages, diagnostic capacity gaps — in these areas AI and robotics could bring massive improvements. Instead of waiting months for an examination or procedure, it could be days. This isn’t science fiction; it’s a capacity question.
🌍 For me, the real stakes are freedom and competition.
If robotics and AI truly push prices downward by making production cheaper, we must not suffocate that with bad regulation. Competition is what makes more and more goods and services accessible.
🧑🤝🧑 At the same time, one thing becomes more valuable: the human element.
A real conversation. Genuine service. A painting created by a person who put emotion and story into it — not something printed by a machine. One paradox of the future may be this: the more machines we have, the more valuable what is human becomes.
🧾 To close with a simple thought: the future can be good — if we use it well.
We need to learn, stay flexible, and remain proactive. In nature, what doesn’t bend eventually breaks.
🚗 (And yes — I recorded these thoughts while sitting in the car during my son’s training session… Tesla might switch the lights on me any minute. 😄)
#robotics #AI #future #work #economy #innovation #tax #inflation #healthcare #adaptation #Hungary #technology
🧠 Change is never born from “good ideas.”
Change always comes from problems and necessity. And this time will be no different: AI and robotics are not hobby projects — they are a response to the fact that running the world has become too expensive, too slow, and too complex.
⚙️ If we understand this, the real question is not whether robotics is coming. The real question is what we do with it — as individuals and as a society. Many of you immediately asked in the comments: what happens to those whose jobs are replaced by robots? A fair question.
📜 This has happened many times in history.
Hunter-gatherer societies gave way to agriculture — and suddenly most people no longer had to spend their entire day searching for food.
During the Industrial Revolution, machines triggered riots and factory burnings — yet in the end, society gained more than it lost.
The Roman aqueducts are another example: when water was no longer carried by people but moved by gravity “working” for us, it became cheaper, more accessible, and human energy was freed up for other purposes.
📊 I ran some numbers on what this could mean locally.
In Hungary, about 4.6 million people are employed, and roughly 900,000 jobs could potentially be automated (not all — closer to about a quarter). In certain types of tasks, one robot can replace the work of 4–5 people.
This is an enormous leap in efficiency — but it can also create serious tension if handled poorly.
🏛️ Here comes the sensitive part: I don’t believe the answer is simply “distributing money” to everyone.
If the solution is handing out free money, inflation is often the result — and over time the system can destabilize because it becomes unclear where and how labor was actually replaced. This won’t look like 10 robots arriving tomorrow and 40 people being fired. It will be a slow, gradual transition.
💡 A more realistic approach might be to use part of the productivity gains generated by robots to reduce taxes.
If one robot replaces the work of 4–5 people, the solution should not be to increase the burden on workers — but the opposite. The additional output generated by automation could help reduce taxes on human labor. In a simple model, I calculated that the tax burden could potentially be reduced by 7–8 percentage points — if implemented wisely and proportionally.
🏥 And there is another side: robotics doesn’t only replace — it also fills shortages.
Doctor shortages, surgeon shortages, diagnostic capacity gaps — in these areas AI and robotics could bring massive improvements. Instead of waiting months for an examination or procedure, it could be days. This isn’t science fiction; it’s a capacity question.
🌍 For me, the real stakes are freedom and competition.
If robotics and AI truly push prices downward by making production cheaper, we must not suffocate that with bad regulation. Competition is what makes more and more goods and services accessible.
🧑🤝🧑 At the same time, one thing becomes more valuable: the human element.
A real conversation. Genuine service. A painting created by a person who put emotion and story into it — not something printed by a machine. One paradox of the future may be this: the more machines we have, the more valuable what is human becomes.
🧾 To close with a simple thought: the future can be good — if we use it well.
We need to learn, stay flexible, and remain proactive. In nature, what doesn’t bend eventually breaks.
🚗 (And yes — I recorded these thoughts while sitting in the car during my son’s training session… Tesla might switch the lights on me any minute. 😄)
#robotics #AI #future #work #economy #innovation #tax #inflation #healthcare #adaptation #Hungary #technology
1❤️1
