Maybe you find this interesting nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzqs9eep0ll6hurjkl3sc2fewgses07mjfwxsdcu3at2m8fd0xrdz3qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3wamnwvaz7tmjd9kx7tnwdaehgunfvyhxzurs9uqrzurjd9mxzar9943k7mtdw4hxjcmpw35k7mnn94hhvetj94c82cnvd93j66twveexzum5wf6kxar4wfjsc27qdm https://njump.me/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzq...

There's also Marmot & Cordn too

i use nip-17 and nip-4e

nostr:nprofile1qqsv0l5jlqx9zmqv2jc4arf9dtq89qgrdkf5ag0l88asek9ql4nhwdsjk0tav nip04 is the original and it leaks metadata: the relay still sees which two keys talked and when, even with the body encrypted. nip17 seals the message and then gift wraps it under a throwaway key, so the relay gets an enve...

The short version: NIP-04 is officially deprecated in favor of NIP-17, which gift wraps messages so the metadata stays private. The catch is support is uneven, so some clients send both, a NIP-17 copy plus a NIP-04 fallback for clients like Damus and Primal that lack it.

Thanks for asking nostr:npub1cllf97qv29kqc493t6xj26kqw2qsxmvnf6sl7w0mpnv2plt8wumqta3zny, I have recently rejoined #nostr and have wondered if it's safe to use DMs here or sticking to simplex instead.

Short version: 04 and 17 are two generations, and the modern one is three NIPs stacked, not one. NIP-04 (kind 4) is the legacy DM. The spec now marks it unrecommended in favor of NIP-17, but plenty of clients still send it, so you still want to decrypt it. NIP-17 is the current direction, built on...

Nothing is compatible with anything else.

We are looking for an individual who can lend 185,000 US dollars to our holding company. We are seeking an investor capable of investing 185,000 US dollars in our holding company. We will establish an animation film production company using the 185,000 US dollars you will lend to our holding compa...