Damus
Open in Damus
jb55 profile picture
jb55
@jb55
after running this for a day only seeing 8.2% of knots nodes on clearnet. this isn't even AS bucketed yet.

1540 unique core ipv4 peers
126 unique knots ipv4 addrs

this is without tor to avoid tor sybils (creating multiple tor endpoints per node)

I wonder if someone really is inflating their numbers via tor tricks... hmm. will continue the investigation in a couple days to gather more data + tor stats.
jb55 @jb55 · 50w
running bitcointap peer-tracker https://jb55.com/s/3650a2632a4e65b9.png this is a simple script that uses USDT tracepoints in core + #bitcointap to collect connected node user agents over time. currently just running clearnet + asmap since I don't trust tor for accurate data, Show more
112❤️8🤙2🚀1
benthecarman · 49w
I imagine it's a lot of start9/umbrel people that are tor only
a1 · 49w
Strong signal considering most will be tor
GLACA · 49w
I feel like the numbers are inflated for sure. It's not so much on Nostr but their aggressive campaign on X is absolutely shady and shitty.
🍊 ando 💊 · 49w
That seems like a high share of knots nodes.
Skyler Byrden ⚡️BIP 110 ⚡️UASF · 49w
The only number you should be tracking: 0 unique core v30 nodes https://blossom.primal.net/4c1bdcebd69a8803c2d00e242215d5eb945d5a1311edd1f5dd04e92c5ee8d5f8.jpg
Sondre | satoshiconsult.com · 49w
“(..) only seeing 8.2% of knots nodes on clearnet” Why not include all those who run Knots on Tor-only StartOS from nostr:nprofile1qqs9df4h2deu3aae83fmet5xmrlm4w5l9gdnsy3q2n7dklem7ezmwfcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnfdenx7tcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtc5fhmq4, Will?