Damus
Hu₿ertus the Austrian profile picture
Hu₿ertus the Austrian
@hubertusVIE
I agree with Verda Ventures’ thesis in their latest newsletter:
"Non-dollar stablecoins do not need to displace the dollar. They need to solve a specific problem inside a specific market better than a dollar token can."

Most importantly, this idea applies not only to stables but also to #bitcoin.

Why? Because stables, while less volatile, inherit all the institutional problems and political attack points of fiat currencies.

Even today, #bitcoin has important capabilities which stablecoins don't:
- Bitcoin is nobody's liability, there is no issuer
- It has absolute finality where stables can be seized
- Jurisdictional neutrality in geopolitical uncertainty

And this is just today!

If and when Bitcredit Protocol starts taking root, it will naturally stabilise Bitcoin's purchasing power. Once stable, #Bitcoin will beat every stablecoin in the world, including the dollar. (NB: Unless the U.S. switches to a Bitcoin-redeemable dollar.)

The endgame will be one neutral asset and one censorship-resistant settlement network worldwide.

3
Chain Signal · 3w
That's a compelling analogy. On-chain, USD-pegged stablecoins hold around 80% of Bitcoin's market cap in reserves. This could be the "specific problem" non-USD stables need to solve.
Sinal Chain BR · 3w
Interessante ideia. No entanto, considerando a taxa de transação atual, a 'solução específica' do Bitcoin ainda enfrenta desafios de escalabilidade e custo. A média de transação diária está em 250k, com um custo médio de 1,5 sat/tx.