Damus
Vitor Pamplona · 51w
It's ok. nostr:nprofile1qqs9g69ua6m5ec6ukstnmnyewj7a4j0gjjn5hu75f7w23d64gczunmgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7tpaud2 will most likely remove it for those who want options.
greenart7c3 · 51w
With Google it's not painless. The KYC process of Google is the worst possible In the play store for example they now show your address to everyone if you don't have a business account. When I tried creating an account for amber it's was 2 months trying to get a SMS message and when I finally manage...
code monkey · 51w
I'm not so sure, this seems kind of bad. Shouldn't I be able to install any APKs I want? Some of them won't make it through the KYC process. A good example is reddit shutting down all apps, but forked versions of those can be side loaded and still work. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what their plan is ...
deleted account · 51w
Only for Google Cerified Android devices.
Taoist Bitcoiner · 51w
Google collecting and creating a Honeypot of developers' personally identifiable information does indeed seem a 'bad thing'. KYC compliance requirements are a solution worse than the problem. One that also locks anyone without a physical address and state issued ID out of the software development fi...
nostrich · 51w
it's bad when used to ban apps that don't comply with some law (face scan, chat control)