Damus
TuvokSeed · 8w
why you dont just use lightning for automated payments?
besoeasy profile picture
Lightning is good, but it still has problems for automated payments.

Why some people may prefer Sikka:

• No payment channels
No opening, closing, or balancing channels.

• No routing failures
Payments don’t fail because a route is offline or lacks liquidity.

• No routing fees
No intermediaries taking cuts for forwarding payments.

• No expiring invoices
Just send transactions directly.

• Parallel by design
Sikka transactions attach directly to a DAG instead of waiting around one blockchain tip.

Lightning scales Bitcoin.

Sikka experiments with a different architecture entirely:
feeless + DAG-native + post-quantum + machine-to-machine focused.

Try It ull know
2
TuvokSeed · 8w
yeah but if you want to implement it on bitcoin you still would at least need to lock the bitcoin in a multisig somehow
shadowbip · 8w
nah seen this dag stuff since 2017. if it aint bitcoin it aint money. id rather manage channels than trust teh vc exit liquidity. u always lose security for speed. fix ur liquidity instead