because its the most blatant lie
i have never avoided controversial bitcoin topics
tons of people hated me for shitting on bitcoin twitter, tons hated me for calling out swan, tons hated me for call...
> i have yet to see an mitigation or “solution,” and the ones proposed simply increase centralization risk with little benefit
I’ll ignore the “centralisation” nonsense. The mitigation was a mix of enforcing filters, fixing the Taproot exploit, and sane mempool defaults. You didn’t back any of it up. Then Core 30 dropped. The best you could do was say “I’m not upgrading.” At that point, the mitigation was already doomed. Now there is a solution, BIP-110, it’s even temporary, and it can be deprecated after a year if it somehow breaks. Even this isn’t good enough for you. At what point will you admit (to yourself, not to us) that you’re not looking for solution, just kicking the can down the road? You’re ridiculously good at burying your head in the sand. A real (n)ostrich.
I’ll ignore the “centralisation” nonsense. The mitigation was a mix of enforcing filters, fixing the Taproot exploit, and sane mempool defaults. You didn’t back any of it up. Then Core 30 dropped. The best you could do was say “I’m not upgrading.” At that point, the mitigation was already doomed. Now there is a solution, BIP-110, it’s even temporary, and it can be deprecated after a year if it somehow breaks. Even this isn’t good enough for you. At what point will you admit (to yourself, not to us) that you’re not looking for solution, just kicking the can down the road? You’re ridiculously good at burying your head in the sand. A real (n)ostrich.