nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq2spdmtqs75xq7mje3am8jq0nr33rkclkyzxm8r22l7w92f0zqsqsdfepsg Further: the cases against models are only tangentially related to memorization. It's ...
@nprofile1q... Perfect memorization is also irrelevant - lossy compression is also a thing, doesn't stop copyright from applying (otherwise reencoding videos would remove their copyright).
Ultimately though what matters for infringement is whether the original work was substantially used to produce the new work (regardless of the exact process) - and clearly that's the case.
Not even the AI companies dispute infringement, they argue that it's "fair use" instead.
Ultimately though what matters for infringement is whether the original work was substantially used to produce the new work (regardless of the exact process) - and clearly that's the case.
Not even the AI companies dispute infringement, they argue that it's "fair use" instead.
1