Damus
hazeycode · 171w
🎯🎯 nothing to discuss.
zebra · 171w
Definitely not open. If its AI its just a question of definition of AI. but its not open so its dificult to say how it follows definiton.
Alekandar Svetski · 171w
Closed ML seems like a more apt description. I don’t think intelligence is simply an inference engine or stochastic parrot, so in that sense, I think we’re far from the intelligence piece. The attempt to unbias it is obviously a bias and that’s where the real issue with the closed-ness comes...
The ₿itcoin Artist · 171w
Agreed. Open source LLMs may be as important as open source money
arkinox · 171w
fac chec troo
ᴄʏʙᴇʀɢᴜʏ 👽 · 171w
I think it is nkt worth to discuss, you are absolutely right! ...and the ChatGPT is a notorious lyer.
Skroo · 171w
People tend to conflate intelligence and consciousness and they are not the same.
InBoston · 171w
Facebook has and will probably do more for open source AI than most companies. I know people hate Facebook but I feel that is indeed the case.
jacob · 171w
... it is internet radio https://www.youtube.com/embed/BzAdXyPYKQo
Leonardo Perez · 171w
nostr:npub1tsgw6pncspg4d5u778hk63s3pls70evs4czfsmx0fzap9xwt203qtkhtk4 OpenAI is neither Open or AI. Discuss
Fluff Stack ⚡ · 171w
Just ask chatGPT honest questions about Bitcoin vs fiat. You'll see its bias on this topic is insurmountable.
VINNY · 171w
It seems like a party trick performed by a malicious wizard
ladidai 🇳🇬🗽 · 171w
You’re 50% correct.
Paul · 171w
#[2]​ is neither #[3]​ nor #[4]​.