Anyway, the entire rhetorical trick to this op-ed, and the one Dustin doesn't want you to notice, is the idea that "labor" and "workers" are literally white bigot men in hard hats who have a Teamsters...
@nprofile1q... (looks up producerism) — oh, every UK party except the greens does that. so _that's_ what it's called. ta.
Starmer: "we're the party for working people!" (subtext: not children, the disabled who can't work, the unemployed, whatever we call "housewives" now, etc etc)
Let's see if Burnham pulls the same trick.
Starmer: "we're the party for working people!" (subtext: not children, the disabled who can't work, the unemployed, whatever we call "housewives" now, etc etc)
Let's see if Burnham pulls the same trick.