Maybe this will help you understand
nostr:nevent1qqs9jh0zz0vg2gte3jemha9sq4j7gwg4tscyvt6smynfpppf5qfemkq97yxgn
Interesting. That certainly suggests that a soft fork *can* succeed with even less than current support levels. Does that mean you also expect a similar last minute shift to occur for #BIP110? I guess so, since you mentioned there's no down side to miners to signal.
The picture is starting to come together. Just need to tie off a few more loose ends.
You mentioned that miners can lose up to 13% fee revenue. Is that due to the 13% of RDTS nodes that won't submit transactions to non-signalling miners? Or is it something else? And if that's the case, wouldn't that be a temporary situation, because those transactions will eventually be routed through other non-BIP110 nodes?
The picture is starting to come together. Just need to tie off a few more loose ends.
You mentioned that miners can lose up to 13% fee revenue. Is that due to the 13% of RDTS nodes that won't submit transactions to non-signalling miners? Or is it something else? And if that's the case, wouldn't that be a temporary situation, because those transactions will eventually be routed through other non-BIP110 nodes?