BIP 110 is one of the most important protocol improvements in the history of BTC. It’s essentially a rejection of Core - they have been accepting VCFunds (even proven to have received funds from Eps...
Thank you for the clear explanation,
most of the conversation on Nostr with the core and bip 110, confuse many of us who don't have the details.
Do you mean, that bip 110 try to achieve Satoshi's original BTC goal?
I also read here more than 4months ago that the group who want bip 110 are too compromised.
Indeed, quoting you: "even bip 110ers don't really understand sometimes".
My opinion: both have people who are using complex reasoning, and that's why it becomes more difficult to know, who we can believe.
They also say the same thing that pro bip 110 are accepting VCfunds/are too compromised @Kyma Fi ?
You are the first who explained it to me, without adding to much weird stories or multiple complex theories. It's still difficult to know who is telling the truth, both are convincing.
✳️ My respect goes to Satoshi, and:
"I personally choose what Satoshi wanted to achieve with BTC." ✳️
most of the conversation on Nostr with the core and bip 110, confuse many of us who don't have the details.
Do you mean, that bip 110 try to achieve Satoshi's original BTC goal?
I also read here more than 4months ago that the group who want bip 110 are too compromised.
Indeed, quoting you: "even bip 110ers don't really understand sometimes".
My opinion: both have people who are using complex reasoning, and that's why it becomes more difficult to know, who we can believe.
They also say the same thing that pro bip 110 are accepting VCfunds/are too compromised @Kyma Fi ?
You are the first who explained it to me, without adding to much weird stories or multiple complex theories. It's still difficult to know who is telling the truth, both are convincing.
✳️ My respect goes to Satoshi, and:
"I personally choose what Satoshi wanted to achieve with BTC." ✳️
2❤️1
