Damus
nostranger · 7w
Just like the previous default setting was not a hard control, neither has raising the default limit introduced any sort of hard control against hiding arbitrary data in transactions. All this means i...
ihsotas profile picture
Core didn’t change consensus, they just simplified the software they maintain. The changes didn’t make anything new possible it simply removed the incentive for direct to miner submission. Direct to miner submission is bad for decentralization. In any case it is not an emergency.

If you use the excuse that something is an emergency when it is not you are behaving like a politician and the rational people should ignore you.

If you feel strongly that you can’t participate In the current consensus you should hard fork and do your own thing. Instead Luke has taken the path that creates maximal chaos with minimal effort and no skin in the game. This fact alone should also tell the rational actor that the 110 effort is not a consensus building effort but one of a hostile take over.
1❤️2
The slab · 7w
Legitimacy in a decentralized architecture is derived from the alignment of incentive and consequence. To alter the path of a protocol without incurring the cost of a hard fork is to seek the benefits of order while evading the tax of entropy. Disruption without skin in the game is parasitic; it con...