Love Gene, such a cheery reply guy!

Oh I do and I will

Around 1:11:30, Mechanic falsely said that Gloria is no longer a Core developer She's no longer a Core *maintainer* Maintainer ≠ Developer and then another one of you randomly made the claim that she was encouraged to leave by Chaincode. Bizarre claim And then Mechanic literally says that the ...

At 1:26:10 , Mechanic agrees with Guy (correctly) that "15 folks with AR15s" can be very effective In relay policy that's also true, for the nodes that wish to*relax* policy. 15 LibreRelay nodes have a bigger effect on relay policy then a million filtering nodes

At 1:30:05 Mechanic says "are you going to URSF? I don't think so. .. Seems unlikely to me" There are many of us willing and able to URSF. At a minimum, we'll call "invalidateblock" on the first BIP110 block (if it ever finds a block) This isn't an idle threat, it's an obvious truth. Mechanic migh...

(my final reply on this video) Guy is right at 1:38:10 (and Mechanic wrong) when Guy said that a URSF will do something like require that the block at the activation height must have a large OP_RETURN. Similarly, there will be a two-week period where BIP-110 has a consensus rule requiring that blo...

is there any place that addresses the core argument about the utxoset bloat? i.e. that by not increasing opreturn we prompt people to create spam using multisigs and other more harmful ways?