Damus
Dustin Dannenhauer · 35w
Can you link to these “perspectives” that “Nostr” can be objectively refuted?
Troy profile picture
- High bandwidth usage

- Relay operators need to get paid, and the typical user currently pays for centralized services by sharing their data. Paying for multiple relays will not be accepted by these folks.

- Instead of one evil corporation having your data, everyone has access to your notes, etc.

- Privacy was never a consideration in the protocol design

- NIPs are a moving target. People have been attempting to implement private (secure) chats and marketplaces, but have to keep rewriting and redesigning what they just released.

I'm sure if you spend a few minutes, you can think of other issues, unless you're a new user.
2❤️1👀1
Dustin Dannenhauer · 35w
This is great, appreciate this. I believe there's good progress happening on all these fronts. Good news is the permissionless-ness is working just fine 🚀
richard · 35w
- high bandwidth usage that's one of the tradeoffs, keep reading below to understand. - relay operators need to get paid not necessarily, the goal that is currently work in progress is to have the outbox model be widely adopted. every user has their own relay they run, or have someone run for the...
nostrich · 35w
> Relay operators need to get paid This is so true. On the internet, we have no services run by volunteers. And volunteers don't operate in any field to further fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech. And, of course, organizations are all run for profit. Oh, wait…