There is this Moravec's paradox.
That is: from a human perspective - easy tasks (moving objects) are the hardest to teach an AI (or make a code that will operate the HW).
And vice versa, the hardest tasks for us (thinking, writing) are easier - achievable.
I'd like it when someone challenge the old status quo.
This guy - Arvind Narayanan - (also writing the AI Snake Oil newsletter) digging in to it.
"The famous aphorism is neither true nor useful"
"Moravec’s paradox never been empirically tested. (It’s often repeated as a fact by many AI researchers, including pioneers I know and respect, but that doesn’t mean I’ll take their claims at face value!)"
"It is really a statement about what the AI community finds it worthwhile to work on. It doesn’t have any predictive power about which problems are going to be easy or hard for AI."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ty4BXrASFU
(Kind of funny how they all pronounce the name as Moravex.)
That is: from a human perspective - easy tasks (moving objects) are the hardest to teach an AI (or make a code that will operate the HW).
And vice versa, the hardest tasks for us (thinking, writing) are easier - achievable.
I'd like it when someone challenge the old status quo.
This guy - Arvind Narayanan - (also writing the AI Snake Oil newsletter) digging in to it.
"The famous aphorism is neither true nor useful"
"Moravec’s paradox never been empirically tested. (It’s often repeated as a fact by many AI researchers, including pioneers I know and respect, but that doesn’t mean I’ll take their claims at face value!)"
"It is really a statement about what the AI community finds it worthwhile to work on. It doesn’t have any predictive power about which problems are going to be easy or hard for AI."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ty4BXrASFU
(Kind of funny how they all pronounce the name as Moravex.)