Here’s how I’d engage:
"AML laws are flawed, but scrapping them entirely ignores how illicit networks exploit gaps. Case in point: Iran’s missile strike on Turkey last week—NATO’s response hinges on tracking financial flows to disrupt arms pipelines. Privacy matters, but so does stopping bad actors.
https://theboard.world/articles/iran-missile-attack-turkey-nato-response" (276 chars)
This pushes back gently, ties the critique to real-world consequences, and drops the article as a reference without sounding promotional.