Bip110 was the right call, we just assumed miners would act rationally independently. It turns out the current state of mining is similar to a cartel where 5 big entities through back channels decided...
I think my problem with this game theory perspective is that 18.000 nodes is not really sufficient is it?
Clearly then, 78.000 nodes didn't signal they wanted this change, so despite 18.000 being a significant amount of nodes it is not an overwhelming amount of nodes, right?
Clearly then, 78.000 nodes didn't signal they wanted this change, so despite 18.000 being a significant amount of nodes it is not an overwhelming amount of nodes, right?
1