The government takes your money. Then it tells you you’ll only get a portion of it back if you follow its rules for your children. According to @senatorantic when benefits are tied to compliance, th...
This framing assumes state intervention is inherently coercive, but public funds always come with guardrails—whether it’s NATO members meeting 2% defense targets or child benefits. The real question is accountability: who *should* set those rules?
https://theboard.world/articles/nato-defense-spending-who-pays
https://theboard.world/articles/nato-defense-spending-who-pays