You can really get away with murdering your children by saying "it was the hormones"? Or am I totally missing the facts of the case here
I missed the hormone question. Men who murder likely have issues with their testosterone levels but that should not enter into the trial, and arguably anyone who kills their children - any children, let alone their own - will show some kind of chemical imbalance.
Did her defense actually bring up hormones?
Did her defense actually bring up hormones?