I heard similar arguments during the block size wars. “Bigger blocks will mean more financial activity! Bitcoin was meant to be used as money!”
It was wrong to change Bitcoin then for the big blo...
first of all that was a hard fork.
second of all big blocheads didn't believe everyone should run a node.
bip110 is a soft fork that is "changing" less things than the previous two. and do it to power node runners. they are not even changes, mostly they are just harding of what was the default network policy for more than 10 years.
that's the exact opposite.
second of all big blocheads didn't believe everyone should run a node.
bip110 is a soft fork that is "changing" less things than the previous two. and do it to power node runners. they are not even changes, mostly they are just harding of what was the default network policy for more than 10 years.
that's the exact opposite.
1