For years, there has been FUD that Bitcoin's blockchain could be criminalised by storing CSAM on it.
For years, the answer has always been that Bitcoin doesn't support data storage, and the offending...
In other words, Bitcoin is a monetary network and it should JUST be a monetary network.
This is what's being said here, nothing else. This is pure conservatism, there's nothing new being argued here. This is a statement to keep and focus on Bitcoin as a monetary network only.
No data, no images, no nothing, just monetary data, as neutral and specific as possible. Like it has been working until now. Focus on has been working until now and try to keep like that as much as possible. It's in essence a form of monetary conservatism too.
On the other side, Bitcoin core 30> is more experimental, more open. That's the new idea. This is the old way.
Or am I missing something here?
This is what's being said here, nothing else. This is pure conservatism, there's nothing new being argued here. This is a statement to keep and focus on Bitcoin as a monetary network only.
No data, no images, no nothing, just monetary data, as neutral and specific as possible. Like it has been working until now. Focus on has been working until now and try to keep like that as much as possible. It's in essence a form of monetary conservatism too.
On the other side, Bitcoin core 30> is more experimental, more open. That's the new idea. This is the old way.
Or am I missing something here?
1
