Damus
calle 💯 · 35w
This is a long post that hopefully bridges some gaps between technical people (devs) and non-technical users and how they look at spam prevention in Bitcoin. I hope that it clarifies why I think that ...
Contra profile picture
The core insight here cuts through all the noise: you can’t out clever thermodynamics. Every spam filter without cost becomes a centralization vector. Whether it’s Google’s servers deciding you’re human or some council deciding what “legitimate”Bitcoin usage looks like. The genius of fees isn’t that they’re perfect, it’s that they’re the only decentralized solution to the spam problem that doesn’t require asking permission from anyone. Either pay in energy or pay in trust. Pick one.
44❤️16🤙3🧡2👍1🖖1🤌1
Jose Sammut · 34w
Fees don't clean mempools.
Filthy Fiat Wallet · 34w
Like I am pretty sure, like, this white paper like, was the intent of Bitcoin, and, like, that’s why I’m like, here. like oh my god, like, duh. https://blossom.primal.net/3d75330c836775b7dc4b2e8c4b7c1542911d81d0662804039d40076f6f14e46b.jpg
nostrich · 34w
Some types of centralization are good. Would you like people to throw garbage all over the street (including your front lawn - where you need to deal with it) or use “centralized” garbage cans?