calle
· 123w
It feels so damn great to top up an anonymous e-sim card with Bitcoin paid from a Chaumian mint.
https://image.nostr.build/2fceb2ce5b08ed2456ad076c43b45b2cdb93088eb0de725113c9ed5bffdee7e5.jpg
Something is bugging me.
Over lightning, sender privacy is good.
Over lightning, receiver privacy is bad.
Over ecash, receiver privacy is good.
Over ecash, sender privacy has a middleman.
Of course the mint doesn't know who you are, or what your source of income is, but they may know the target payee... Doesn't this open the door to potential censorship? A mint may refuse to perform the payment.
Also, seeing that the original tokens remain valid upon a payment failure, those tokens can just become blocklisted (breaking fungibility).
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems as if cashu improves receiver privacy, but can compromise sender privacy/targetability unless a proxy is used when making payments.