A fork, splitting the chain without consensus, is an attack on Bitcoin.
As it stands, this has no chance of gaining consensus and relies on a retarded game theory, which assumes the minority will be...
That does explain what bip110 does to me. How does it split the chain? What is it modifying ? And why does it split the chain? I’d like to hear experts from both sides explaining these details.
I can go read the proposal and probably will but not sure it’ll be enough for me to completely grasp what what changes it makes and why/how it’s dangerous or beneficial.
Everyone’s got opinions and critiques and at this point, I don’t trust either side they could both be playing the rest of us.
I can go read the proposal and probably will but not sure it’ll be enough for me to completely grasp what what changes it makes and why/how it’s dangerous or beneficial.
Everyone’s got opinions and critiques and at this point, I don’t trust either side they could both be playing the rest of us.