Damus
Maple · 5w
A fork, splitting the chain without consensus, is an attack on Bitcoin. As it stands, this has no chance of gaining consensus and relies on a retarded game theory, which assumes the minority will be...
YEGHRO profile picture
That does explain what bip110 does to me. How does it split the chain? What is it modifying ? And why does it split the chain? I’d like to hear experts from both sides explaining these details.

I can go read the proposal and probably will but not sure it’ll be enough for me to completely grasp what what changes it makes and why/how it’s dangerous or beneficial.

Everyone’s got opinions and critiques and at this point, I don’t trust either side they could both be playing the rest of us.
1❤️1
Monsieur Socrates · 5w
I’m no expert but as far as I can tell Bip 110 tightens the rules of Bitcoin so that only 83 bytes is allowed for op_return. It return to way Bitcoin was set up before core v30 allows the maximum amount of op_return. If I have this wrong someone call me out on it