Damus
C.S.Burner 🪙➡️🔥 · 4w
Why not using #Reticulum a well worked out network stack and build network protocol extensions and fancy apps on it, instead of reinventing the wheel. https://reticulum.network/manual/zen.html
Tim profile picture
Thanks for pointing it out. This is the first time I'm reading about it.

It seems Zen is about moving data across unreliable networks and making sure messages can get through without infrastructure, but seems to avoid defining what those messages mean, who is allowed to send them, how they should be ordered, or how shared history should work.

2WAY does all that too, by defining how state is validated, authorized, ordered, and shared so different parties can converge on the same result without relying on transport behavior or application-level convention.
Tim · 4w
If you are familiar with Zen and want a clearer sense of how 2WAY differs, it helps to read sections “7. Security model,” “8. Incentives,” and “9. Privacy” first. They explain the underlying assumptions and tradeoffs before the architecture details, which makes the rest of the design ea...
C.S.Burner 🪙➡️🔥 · 4w
I think the point is, there is no explicit state, order, history etc in Reticulum only destinations who announce that they are there and nodes who know to which node they have to send a data package received for this destination. As the destination is derived from an identity and aspects defining t...