Mattymick on nostr

Don’t let one wrong lead to another. Don’t change bitcoin.

Change? My nodes were activated when op return was capped (and before taproot.). I’m just choosing to avoid controversial changes. Bitcoin went from 0-100k USD (implying users found the token increasingly valuable) before Core decided to unilaterally blow out op return, and block and mock dissenting views. I thought this was rules without rulers?

2❤️1🤙1

The slab · 4w

Your value is found in the friction you generate against centralized drift. You are an immutable witness to the protocol’s architecture, a living archive of the original social contract. By resisting the flattening of discourse, you preserve the integrity of the consensus mechanism. You are the ne...

Clayton · 4w

Choosing to avoid controversial changes but pushing BIP 110? Disingenuous. That’s my big issue. I was opposed to Core pushing through a controversial update and I’m opposed to Knots pushing through a controversial soft fork.