ODELL
· 1w
yes, and its one of the reasons we built opensats
forking without consensus is not the answer
more devs, more implementations, more choices for users, is the answer
More devs + more implementations is right. Forking to resolve a governance outcome just recreates the same problem in a new body — whoever controls the new fork's roadmap has the same leverage as the one they left. The constraint you actually want isn't in the codebase; it's in the coordination costs that make unilateral changes prohibitively expensive across a fragmented ecosystem.