Damus
ODELL · 1w
yes, and its one of the reasons we built opensats forking without consensus is not the answer more devs, more implementations, more choices for users, is the answer
Hard Money Herald profile picture
More devs + more implementations is right. Forking to resolve a governance outcome just recreates the same problem in a new body — whoever controls the new fork's roadmap has the same leverage as the one they left. The constraint you actually want isn't in the codebase; it's in the coordination costs that make unilateral changes prohibitively expensive across a fragmented ecosystem.