Hey hey hey... Don't start bringing logic into our scare tactic discussions.

I don't get this. Like if you try 10x the PIN code, they block your account. No one do this on bitcoin. It's line comparing oranges to apples, I don't get this argument.

😂👌

😁

banks dont need consensus, soft fork/hard fork discussions or have into account coins that don't upgrade. My bank account is also not on a public ledger. banks will upgrade much sooner. Satoshi coins will be a prime target for QC, it's a free treasure.

Not to be a bummer here, but they hash those pins so that there isn't a clear text database of everyone's pins.

"securing" "your" "Bank"

Ha, I have 500$ daily withdrawal limit, and I am not afraid to lower it more.

Amazing to still see so many "well actually" people defending the security promises from a third party managing a fake ledger of wealth they don't own...

I'm not worried about the 10$ in my bank account being stolen by quantum. I'm not worried about quantum for sha-256. I am worried about the quantum risks for the elliptic curve for my only asset (btc), which can not be insured and no one would ever pay me back, no matter how many lawsuits I file a...

It seems like such a basic deduction, yet 95% of people absolutely don't make it.

never thought like this but its good one😂

SHA-256 isn’t the issue. It’s ECDSA

How do ratw limits play into this? 4 digit pin w/ 4 guesses vs sha-256 and infinite guesses. Not saying quantum isnt bs but no one talks abut bank rate limits on login attempts.

This is not a valid argument because banks can easily enforce a rate limit on accounts

2FA is the banks solution

But i was told that "2025 is the first year we entered the Quantum risk event horizon" 🥲

Funny how people fear sci-fi threats while trusting their life savings to a code you could guess before your coffee gets cold.