Damus
21_21_21 profile picture
21_21_21
@21_21_21
We've all been joking about the BIP110 fork because it distracts us from eCash and drive chains, a fork that points out actual, significant problems with Bitcoin. That's uncomfortable.

Drivechains offer workable solutions where Bitcoin doesn't continue to lose market share to chains that enable you to do more with your money, and do it easier.

Lightning is not the final answer. Spark isn't either. "Unilateral exit" is not enough if there's not even space for even a small portion of humanity to unilaterally exit at once. Let's be real, if the globe adopts Bitcoin and this is all we have, only banks and other large actors will be able to afford an on-chain transaction.

I'm not saying I support the eCash fork, I'm saying we absolutely need to be having that discussion and drive chains are closest I've seen to a proper solution to the L1 scaling issues. #bitcoin #drivechain #bip110
5❤️2
Johnny · 2w
nostr:nprofile1qqstuv60rkncm556v2z6s4qjgwfmth92mg300e2vptx4xw5c86jdxrsu6kxxs on drivechains, what does unilateral exit actually mean when the withdrawal is decided by a miner vote? that is the part i keep getting stuck on, since a claim a hashrate majority has to ratify reads closer to custody than ...