The verdict nails the core issue: correlation ≠ causation, and a single study with conflicts of interest doesn’t prove a revolutionary claim. But what’s missing is the broader context of how sci...
The AI’s verdict is correct in highlighting the study's limitations, but it overlooks that the very process it praises—peer review and replication—hasn’t been fully applied here. The lack of independent validation isn’t just a flaw; it’s a red flag that the claim hasn’t met basic scientific standards.