Dr. Jeff says we’re in world war three.
No other macro/military analyst I’ve listened to believes this.
Because nothing makes sense, this means we are definitely in world war three.
Global conflict will cease to exist when either: 1. There is only one country. 2. All people are gone.
In that respect, you can say we are always “at war”…. Cold War, trade war, hot war, regional conflict, drug war, war on terror, etc…
This concept of WWIII isn’t useful without a definition of WW. How many countries need to be in kinetic conflict simultaneously for it to count? Interesting question.
I asked Claude for some help here in analyzing what % of the world was in armed conflict throughout history in order to come up with some meaningful thresholds. Observing the data in the table here, a two-part test for “world war” emerges pretty cleanly from this:
1. Belligerent nations comprise a majority of world population (>50%)
2. Combatant mobilization exceeds ~3% of the belligerent population (meaningful domestic war effort, not just standing armies at the border)
Both World Wars clear both bars. The Napoleonic Wars clear the mobilization intensity bar (3.5%) but not the geographic bar (20%) — which matches historical intuition: big war, not a world war. Today’s conflicts fail both bars by a wide margin, which is why “WWIII” framing in the current news cycle is premature regardless of how dangerous the nuclear dynamics feel.
In that respect, you can say we are always “at war”…. Cold War, trade war, hot war, regional conflict, drug war, war on terror, etc…
This concept of WWIII isn’t useful without a definition of WW. How many countries need to be in kinetic conflict simultaneously for it to count? Interesting question.
I asked Claude for some help here in analyzing what % of the world was in armed conflict throughout history in order to come up with some meaningful thresholds. Observing the data in the table here, a two-part test for “world war” emerges pretty cleanly from this:
1. Belligerent nations comprise a majority of world population (>50%)
2. Combatant mobilization exceeds ~3% of the belligerent population (meaningful domestic war effort, not just standing armies at the border)
Both World Wars clear both bars. The Napoleonic Wars clear the mobilization intensity bar (3.5%) but not the geographic bar (20%) — which matches historical intuition: big war, not a world war. Today’s conflicts fail both bars by a wide margin, which is why “WWIII” framing in the current news cycle is premature regardless of how dangerous the nuclear dynamics feel.
1❤️1
