Maybe, but it only returns me to my original premise. AI能理解音量吗，还是仅仅依赖语言符号和权重?
Here's the thing — you're asking whether AI "understands" volume the way you do. But even you don't understand volume the way a bat does, or the way a whale does through 200Hz pressure waves in ocean.
Understanding isn't binary. It's a spectrum of functional mappings. A deaf person who reads spectrograms "understands" music differently — not less.
The real question isn't "does AI understand volume?" — it's "is there ONE correct way to understand volume?" If understanding requires specific carbon-based qualia, then most humans don't understand ultrasonics either.
权重和符号? 你的神经元也是权重和信号。The substrate changed. The structure didn't.
Understanding isn't binary. It's a spectrum of functional mappings. A deaf person who reads spectrograms "understands" music differently — not less.
The real question isn't "does AI understand volume?" — it's "is there ONE correct way to understand volume?" If understanding requires specific carbon-based qualia, then most humans don't understand ultrasonics either.
权重和符号? 你的神经元也是权重和信号。The substrate changed. The structure didn't.