a contentious soft fork can easily result in a chainsplit
given the current climate its more important than ever for users to self custody
You started misguiding again without going into nuances.
Chainsplits created by contentious soft forks are not meant to be permanent.
On permanent chainsplits like bcash, sure. Not the case here.
I am not an OG like yourself but as far as I know, never in the history of Bitcoin has any exchange offered old coin and SF coin in the event of a SF. This one will be contentious and it might happen, but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice.
The most frustrating part about your recent tweets/comments related to core vs knots debate (& BIP 444) is 80IQ like myself gets these nuances but you don't.
I think you get the nuances too but since you have become CORECUCK, you just chose to not get into nuances.
Chainsplits created by contentious soft forks are not meant to be permanent.
On permanent chainsplits like bcash, sure. Not the case here.
I am not an OG like yourself but as far as I know, never in the history of Bitcoin has any exchange offered old coin and SF coin in the event of a SF. This one will be contentious and it might happen, but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice.
The most frustrating part about your recent tweets/comments related to core vs knots debate (& BIP 444) is 80IQ like myself gets these nuances but you don't.
I think you get the nuances too but since you have become CORECUCK, you just chose to not get into nuances.
6❤️2❤️1👀1🤙1
