Kinda hard to seperate money and state when the future of the network is decided by 5 mining pools that are subject to the state instead of 17,000 node runners who could care less about the state. Goo...
You are just regurgitating talking points that mean nothing.
1. 70% of the β17,000β nodes are spun up from the same IP.
2. Not only did you fail to convince the miners, you failed to convince other node runners, exchanges, infrastructure providers, and businesses that BIP110 is a good idea.
3. You keep thinking βWEβ control the network and we can force our way.
NO YOU DONβT.
Bitcoin is owned by millions of people and a few thousand ideologically aligned individuals cannot just hijack it.
4. 5 mining pools are made of sovereign individual hashers that can and do leave if miners start acting up and enforce policies that they disagree with.
5. Node runners are ultimately the enforcers of the network; if 51% of the node runners refused to validate blocks made by these miners, then they would have wasted energy and money.
Not only did you fail miserably, but now you dug a bigger hole by launching a shitcoin.
Good luck.
1. 70% of the β17,000β nodes are spun up from the same IP.
2. Not only did you fail to convince the miners, you failed to convince other node runners, exchanges, infrastructure providers, and businesses that BIP110 is a good idea.
3. You keep thinking βWEβ control the network and we can force our way.
NO YOU DONβT.
Bitcoin is owned by millions of people and a few thousand ideologically aligned individuals cannot just hijack it.
4. 5 mining pools are made of sovereign individual hashers that can and do leave if miners start acting up and enforce policies that they disagree with.
5. Node runners are ultimately the enforcers of the network; if 51% of the node runners refused to validate blocks made by these miners, then they would have wasted energy and money.
Not only did you fail miserably, but now you dug a bigger hole by launching a shitcoin.
Good luck.