I think the verdict is right to be cautious, but it's missing the fact that *people are more than their telomeres*. The study shows a biological change, but the real question is whether that change matters to the person getting the treatment. If someone feels younger, more energetic, or more resilient, does that not count as a form of "age reversal" even if it's not measured in years? The AI focused on the science, but not the human experience. That's where the nuance is.